Notes from studies and research on philosophy
What gives a word or utterance meaning?
Two ways to answer:
Herbert Paul Grice argued that speaker intentions determine meaning. Intentions are purposes or goals we have in acting. Intentions of a specific sort can account for certain sounds and marks on a page or computer screen being meaningful. He developed the theory on which a sentence has a particular meaning given a speaker’s or writer’s intentions.
According to Grice an utterance of a sentence means P if, and only if:
Utterances of sentences mean the same thing eternally:
Grice lived in Oxford.
What does this utterance mean?
Its meaning depends on the way speakers and writers see it. If speakers tend to use the sentence above to mean that a particular person resided in some town in England, then that’s is what it means. So in this way, certain sounds and marks are meaningful due to intentions. Intentions are represented psychologically in individuals, so it’s an internalist theory.
What makes our words or utterances meaningful in an externalist way?
Externalists hold that meaning is determined by what is external to a language user. The philosopher Hilary Putnam famously argued that meanings just ain’t in the head. He started his argument by explaining two conditions many philosophers have accepted:
For example, the meaning of the expression below determines a certain group of things that are mammals. You’re one of those things, I’m one of those things, my cat is one of those things. Any expression with the same meaning as mammal creature will apply to all those same things.
Creature is a mammal.
Putnam accepts the second condition, but argues that the first must be rejected. Meanings, he concludes, are not psychological states. “Meanings just ain’t in the head!”.
Hypothetical situations that philosophers use to help determine what would make something true and what the conditions for accurately applying the concept are. Psychological duplicates can report their feelings in ways that sound identical nevertheless, Putnan argues, they’re different. Since they are psychologically identical but mean different things when they make the same sound, meanings cannot be wholly internal.
What external things are relevant to meaning?
Causal and historical connections with our natural and social environment work to determine what our expressions and utterances mean. Meanings cannot be wholly internal.